Accessibility: Updates to the 2024 BCBC and Rick Hansen Foundation Accessibility Certification™ (RHFAC)

March 8, 2024, the effective date for the British Columbia Building Code (BCBC) 2024, is quickly moving closer! As a result, we find ourselves digging deeper into this new edition to support our clients and their projects.  At the forefront of the changes within Part 3 of the BCBC 2024 is Section 3.8 - Accessibility.  This no surprise as we notice accessibility and inclusion driving the path forward in many sectors.

Requirements within Section 3.8 aim to support the disability community, including people with mobility disabilities, vision or hearing disabilities, and people with care providers.

Some significant changes to the BCBC include:

  • Increased clear area to exterior entrances and pathways,

  • Modification to required clear space for interior paths of travel which will provide designers with flexibility,

  • Inclusion of colour contrast to highlight building features, and

  • Requirements to support wayfinding.  

Acknowledging the Building Code provides minimum requirements, good design often goes beyond these minimums to support meaningful access.

An example of going beyond these minimums was demonstrated by the City of Vancouver with their commitment to achieve Rick Hansen Foundation Accessible CertificationTM (RHFAC) Gold for all newly built municipal facilities.  

The Rick Hansen Foundation (RHF) is part of the movement to help create a fully accessible and inclusive Canada with the goal to provide meaningful access for everyone. They have developed the RHFAC Rating Survey, a national rating system that provides clients with a snapshot of the overall level of meaningful access of their site.

At Celerity Engineering, Corie Lubben is a RHFAC Professional and can rate pre-construction and existing sites to help clients become leaders in equity, diversity and inclusion, by building accessible spaces that benefit everyone.

RHFAC recently released a new version of their rating survey, RHFAC Rating Survey v4.0, which came into effect January 15, 2024. This new version builds on the previous version and has been expanded to include a wider disability community. An important addition is a new category for Mind-Friendly Environments, which includes new criteria to evaluate how sites accommodate people with various neurological experiences. A second new category, Technology and Innovation, has been added to encourage and recognize innovation and the use of technology to positively impact meaningful access at a site. Updated standards such as CSA B651:23 Accessible design for the built environment and CSA/ASC B652:23 Accessible dwellings are also incorporated within this latest version.

The Rick Hansen Foundation are leaders in accessibility and support inclusion and universal design, and RFHAC v4.0 contains valuable and exciting information which will help accelerate accessible design. Even if your project goal isn’t ultimately to achieve a RHFAC rating, Celerity Engineering can provide comments alongside a typical building code review to help identify barriers and improve accessibility to your site. We look forward to helping our clients integrate these points and practices into their design.

Do Temporary Tent Structures Require a Building Permit in BC?

Yes! Except…. when they don’t.

Because temporary tents do have building code requirements, your municipality (also known as the Authority Having Jurisdiction) may require you to have a building permit. However, they may also waive this requirement, as explained below.

The best choice is to call the authority having jurisdiction right away to determine if they will require your temporary tent structure to have a building permit.

Please note that tents intended for permanent use or occupancy, such as outdoor vehicle shelters, storage, or restaurant patios, must conform to the applicable requirements from either Part 3 or 9 of the BC Building Code (i.e. permanent tent structures used as carports must conform to the Building Code’s Part 3 or 9 requirements for storage garages), and almost always need a building permit.

Why do temporary tents need a building permit?

Tent structures, as understood in the BC Building Code, are temporary structures which have Part 3 requirements that must be reviewed by an authority having jurisdiction.

While not a defined term in Division A, Section 1.4 of the Building Code, the Notes to Part 3 explains that:

“….the word “tent” as used in the Code is intended to refer to a temporary shelter which is used at an open air event such as a fair or an exhibition. A tent will normally be constructed of a fabric held up by poles and attached to the ground by ties.” (A-3.1.6)

The requirements for tent structures can be found in Subsection 3.1.6 of Division B of the BC Building Code and pertain to exiting and egress, occupancy and use, spatial separation, clearance from flammable material, tent material flame resistance, and location of electrical systems. These requirements are reviewed by an authority having jurisdiction and granted approval in the form of a building permit.

Why might the requirement be waived?

Given that tent structures are temporary buildings, the authority having jurisdiction may waive the need for a building permit on the basis of Clause 1.1.1.1.(2)(f) which states the Building Code need not apply to:

“….with the permission of the authority having jurisdiction, temporary buildings including i) construction site offices, ii) seasonal storage buildings, iii) special events facilities, iv) emergency facilities, and v) similar structures.”

As such, you are best to consult with your local authority having jurisdiction to determine if your tent structure will require a building permit.
Give us a call if you need help!

2024 British Columbia Building Code Adoption and Notable Changes

On March 8, 2024, the latest edition of the British Columbia Building Code will officially come into force, except for adaptable dwellings and earthquake changes which take effect March 10, 2025. This phased start allows market sectors that are affected to pivot, adjust processes and acquire the appropriate technology to implement the various changes in the new edition of the BC Building Code.

Based on Canada’s regulatory system this latest installment of the BC Building Code falls in general alignment with the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) 2020, except for specific conditions that reflect the province’s geography, climate, local government needs, industry practices, and provincial priorities. This is the same approach as previous editions of the BC Building Code (a historic summary of BC codes adoption can be found here).

Over 280 technical changes have been incorporated into the NBCC 2020, improving the level of safety, health, accessibility, fire and structural protection, and energy efficiency provided by the Code, and expanding the NBC into new areas. Notable changes that will be reflected in the revised BCBC include:

  • Technical requirements for large farm buildings are added, which address fire protection, occupant safety, structural design, and heating, ventilating and air-conditioning.

  • Encapsulated mass timber construction is introduced, enabling the construction of wood buildings with up to 12 storeys.

  • Accessibility requirements are updated to reduce barriers related to anthropometrics, plumbing facilities, signage, entrances and elevators.

  • Design requirements for evaporative equipment are revised to minimize the growth and transmission of Legionella and other bacteria.

  • A home-type care occupancy is introduced to allow safe and affordable care in a home-type setting.

  • Energy performance tiers are established to provide a framework for achieving higher levels of energy efficiency in housing and small buildings.

  • Changes to curtain wall fire stopping to permit testing in accordance with ASTM E2307, “Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barriers Using Intermediate-Scale, Multi-storey Test Apparatus”.

Notable changes in the BC Building Code include:

  • More complete and specific language for constructing extended rough-ins for radon subfloor depressurization systems

  • Adopting cooling requirements to provide one living space that does not exceed 26 degrees Celsius

  • Retaining existing ventilation requirements for systems serving single dwelling units

  • New methodologies for earthquake design for small buildings, in harmonization with the National Building Code.

  • An elevator in all large two- and three-storey apartment buildings.

Predicting Fire Exposure Hazards

Predicting Fire Exposure Hazards

Abstract

This paper details of the development of a framework and assessment tool that can be utilised:

  • In lieu of the prescriptive requirements detailed in building codes that require fire resistive barriers to separate exit routes from the radiative effects of fire and/or

  • To address egress past a burning object in an open floor area.

Contained within this paper is a methodology that can aid the user in:

  • Determining the level of radiation from a fire source imposed on an egress route that is adjacent to the source, and

  • Determining if the level of radiation will result in sufficient pain to prevent the use of the egress route.

Generally, the calculations are based around quantified fire engineering formulae and good engineering practice.

Cladding in Combustible and Non-Combustible Construction

Introduction:

This bulletin provides some background on cladding systems and clarifies the intent of the code insofar as systems that are tested for use in non-combustible construction and possibly used in the context of combustible construction – such as conventional wood frame.

The intent of the National Building Code is to limit the use and contribution of combustible cladding systems in non-combustible construction. There are a number of mechanisms to achieve this. Use of the same materials in combustible construction is permitted and applications will be clarified in this Bulletin.

Use of Non-Combustible Cladding

Use of materials that are classified as non-combustible- such as pre-formed steel panels and many reinforced cement-based tiles- do not contribute significant fuel to a fire if supported by non-combustible construction. With current energy performance requirements foamed plastic or other insulation may be introduced to reduce heat losses through the wall assembly. This will invoke other code requirements

The contribution of foamed plastics that may be used to insulate wall assemblies is less significant in the context of combustible construction whereas in non-combustible construction, the contribution of fuel can have a significant impact on the expected performance of walls, ceilings/attic spaces and roofs. Consequently, the code requirements are more onerous in the context of non-combustible construction.

Where thermal protection is required for foamed plastic in wood frame exterior wall assemblies this bulletin will clarify the intent of the code for cladding systems.

Composite Materials

Where a composite material is utilised for cladding purposes, the combustibility can increase due to the contribution of insultation in a ‘sandwich-panel’ construction; in this case each element has to be assessed for combustibility. Even where mineral insulation is used in sandwich -type construction it is hard for these composites to meet the code criteria under 3.1.5.1. In most instances the referenced tests will marginally exceed the criteria to be considered non-combustible which means that technically, the cladding material has to be treated as a combustible material- under 3.1.5.5 of the Code.

It should be noted that fire retardant treated wood has a significantly higher heat release rate- 40-50 MJ/m2- than the criteria set out in 3.1.5.1 and significantly higher than most mineral insulated composite aluminum panels (typically around 10MJ/.m2 if non-combustible core). Also, the flame spread of many S-134 tested panels is zero in comparison with FRTW which has a flame spread of 25.

Use of Combustible Cladding in Non-Combustible Construction

Owing to the vertical configuration of cladding systems, higher than expected vertical flame spread can occur than would be expected if the same material were installed in the horizontal position. External Insulation finish system (known as EIFS) is a lightweight synthetic wall cladding that includes foam plastic insulation and thin synthetic coatings. The cladding requirements of the code therefore reflect criteria originally developed for testing of EIFS systems- now set out in the CAN/ULC S-134 test. Although the test criteria for this and other tests such as the NFPA 285 test differ significantly, these tests are intended to be indicative of large scale fire behaviour- and are not that easy to pass without some input from a fire testing specialist. The NFPA test is considered easier to pass than the S-134 test in Canada. Significantly different results can emerge due to the location of the test facility and the weather on the day of the test. The cost of the CAM/ULC S-134 test is somewhat prohibitive and a failure the first time around can quickly escalate costs out of control.

Figure 1: NFPA 285 test in progress.

Figure 2: Images from a recent CAN/ULC S-134 test of architectural cladding system.

Combustible Cladding Options Under the Code

3.1.5.5 of the Code is not entirely clear and a rational explanation of how it should be applied is difficult once different sections and their intent are applied in the context of spatial separation as well as other issues including thermal protection of foamed plastics. That said this bulletin summarises what applies in the vast majority of cases.

Under 3.1.5.5. (1) the use of combustible cladding on unsprinklered non-combustible buildings is limited to 3 storeys- the typical walk up apartment building for instance. Where sprinklered, the use is restricted to:

  • Assemblies where any foamed plastics are protected by a thermal barrier- on the inside of the building.

  • Wall assemblies that pass the criteria of 3.1.5.5 (3) and (4) when tested in conformance with the CAN/ULC S-134 “Fire Test of Exterior Wall Assemblies. These sentences are essentially the pass criteria of the S-134 test. It should be noted that the S-134 test does not test assemblies in combustible construction such as wood frame. What this means is that where combustible construction is permissible, it is acceptable to use an S-134 system on the outside of the assembly as it does not significantly reduce the cladding performance if the S-134 pass criteria have been satisfied. The system has to include the complete assembly including the 5/8inch exterior GWB.

Based on sentence 3.1.5.5.(1), fire retardant treated wood would not satisfy the pass criteria of sentence (3) and (4) as heat release of FRTW is too high. Sentence (5) however, essentially permits it despite the restriction under the above pass criteria. Also, 3.2.2.50 of the BC Building Code 2012 for 5 and 6 storey sprinklered buildings, permits both FRTW or an assembly that satisfies the CAN/ULC S-134 criteria and has a thermal barrier on the inside.

Based on the code wording FRTW would be permitted without a thermal barrier unless the assembly incorporates foamed plastic requiring thermal protection.

An assembly tested to the CAN/ULC S-134 would require both a thermal barrier on the inside as well as the external GWB typically incorporated as part of the test assembly. This would be standard practice in wood frame applications where there is often foamed plastic in the wall cavity. However, if used in non-combustible applications without foamed plastic insulation then this would seem to be unjustified.

Going back to the requirements pertaining to combustible cladding in non-combustible construction there is an exception under 3.1.5.5.(2): where table 3.2.3.7 requires non-combustible cladding.

However, there are various exceptions to the requirement for non-combustible cladding and the main restriction is where the permissible openings are less than 10%. In this case cladding must be non-combustible. As such an S-134 tested system would not be acceptable. This is clarified in the Appendix A of Division B Part 3.

Where the openings permitted are at least 10% then 3.2.3.7 (3) defers back to the S-134 pass criteria set out in 3.2.5.5 which we just reviewed.

Where openings are more than 25% and less than 50% FRTW can be used under certain conditions provided the limiting distance is at least 5m and cladding meets the Part 9 requirements. Also, there is also a general cross reference in 3.2.3.7.(5) back to 3.1.5.5 provided the permissible openings are more than 10% and not more than 25%.

Given the ways these sections are laid out it is not surprising that there is confusion over how different requirements are intended to apply.

Foamed Plastic in the Exterior Building Face

There is a series of requirements under 3.2.3.8 setting out criteria for protection of foamed plastic in the exposing building face; however, assemblies that comply with 3.1.5.5 (S-134 etc. again) do not require to meet the requirements set out in 3.2.3.8 sentences (1) and (2). This is confusing as we have seen that a thermal barrier is specified in the requirements for 6 storey wood frame construction. It appears that the 3.2.2.50 requirements anticipated foamed plastic use and therefore have required it under 3.2.3.8 sentence (3). This also applies under 3.1.5.5 (1) (b)

It should however also be noted that fire blocks are required in exterior walls as per 3.1.11- Fire Blocks in Concealed Spaces. Essentially, this requires fire blocking at each storey and every 20m horizontally unless the insulation is either non-combustible or has a flame spread not more than 25 and has vertical firestopping every 10m vertically. Where there is an air space there should be only one air space and the maximum depth of this should be 25mm (1in.)

Composite Panel Systems

There are several manufacturers that have successfully subjected their systems to the CAN/ULC S-134 test. These systems are designed for use in non-combustible construction but can be used in combustible construction and will not adversely affect the performance of the wall assembly-even if wood frame. The assembly for non-combustible construction consists of:

If the wall is of combustible construction then it is common to use double- walled construction with insulated cavity walls for energy conservation. Where the wall requires a rating, this is typically provided by 1 or more layers of gypsum wallboard on the room side.

Where foamed plastic is sprayed in place for insulation and thermal performance of the wall the foamed plastic in combustible construction typically requires a thermal barrier with certain exceptions.

In non-combustible construction the exterior requirements are more complex but generally:

  1. In most circumstances except for unsprinklered buildings over 18m a thermal barrier of 12.7 (0.5 in.) is required.

  2. Adjacent spaces in wall assemblies are exempted.

  3. For unsprinklered buildings over 18m the board has to be taped and filled- partly due to potential smoke spread.

  4. Attics, interior walls and ceiling assemblies in unsprinklered buildings over 18m have thermal protection increased to 15.9mm thermal barriers taped and filled.

  5. Factory- assembled wall units are dealt with separately.

Examples of a Composite Panel/Architectural Cladding System.

Generally composite panel system consists of the following components. The following are based on the AL13 architectural cladding system.

In combustible construction, the assembly is typically used on the outside of a double wood frame typically) assembly as shown below.

Summary:

  1. Materials that meet the requirements of 3.1.5.1 are permissible for use in non-combustible construction.

  2. Composite panels utilising non-combustible insulation are not able to be classified as non-combustible per se and are dealt with in 3.1.5.5 and elsewhere in the Code.

  3. Use of systems classified as combustible for non-combustible construction typically are required to:

  4. Have a thermal barrier: generally, 12.7mm GWB.

  5. Satisfy the CAN/ULC S-134 test criteria unless openings are limited to a maximum of 10% or

  6. Satisfy the requirements of FRTW with the same limitation on openings.

  7. Use of CAN/ULC S134 assemblies in non-combustible construction must be the same as the tested assembly.

  8. Use of the same assembly is permitted in non-combustible construction and these should be the same assembly on the building exterior with a thermal barrier on the inside.

  9. Fire blocking has to be provided as destribed herein.

Prepared By:

John Ivison

Date:    July 19th 2018